StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Charging Pepsi with False Advertising - Term Paper Example

Summary
This paper discusses the question of did Pepsi made a false or misleading advertisement sufficient to violate the Lanham Act by distributing more than 1 million direct-to-consumer mailers that falsely claimed Coca Cola’s product was harmful and can cause obesity?…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.5% of users find it useful
Charging Pepsi with False Advertising
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Charging Pepsi with False Advertising"

MEMORANDUM TO: Chief Executive Officer of Coca Cola FROM: (your name) DATE: (date) RE: Charging Pepsi with false advertising Question Presented Did Pepsi made a false or misleading advertisement sufficient to violate the Lanham Act by distributing more than 1 million direct-to-consumer mailers that falsely claimed Coca Cola’s product were harmful and can cause obesity? Will the surveys of Coca Cola consumer experts be admitted to court as substantial evidence of false advertising against Pepsi? Brief Answer Yes, Pepsi made a false or misleading advertisement. Lanham Act prohibits the false or misleading representation of fact by way of commercial advertising or promotion which misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities or geographic origin of another person’s goods, services and even commercial activities. Yes, the surveys of the Coca Cola consumer experts can be admitted to court. According to the Federal Rule of Evidence Rule 702, expert testimonies that will assist the trier of fact based on sufficient facts or data are admissible to court. The survey must be a product of reliable principles and methods applied reliably to the facts of the case. Statement of Facts This office is considering whether to prosecute the Pepsi company for false advertising. Coca Cola company discovered that months ago, Pepsi company distributed a mailer directly to consumers as part of their campaign. The mailer focused on Coca Cola causing obesity and compared it to their own product. The mailer stated how Coca Cola products can make the consumers fat due to excessive sugar content. The mailer was distributed across the country to more than 1 million consumers between January 2011 to March 2011. The mailer specifically contained the following statements: “The Coca Cola products’ sugar content is higher than any other Pepsi product.” “More sugar, more harmful.” “More sugar, more prone to obesity.” Weeks after discovery, the Coca Cola Company conducted surveys through the company consumers experts regarding the mailers of Pepsi. One consumer experts made a survey by making interviews amoung groups of consumers. The consumers were divided into two. The first group was exposed to the “control mailer” and the other one was not. The second consumer expert conducted an online survey to group of participants who were consumers of the products. Discussion It is very clear that Pepsi committed false advertising by distributing mailer that claimed Coca Cola’s products can cause obesity. In order to prosecute Pepsi for violating the Lanham Act, the company should be able to prove that the defendant made a false or misleading description in a commercial advertisement. This advertisement actually deceives and should likely influence the purchasing decision which injures the plaintiff as a result. Scotts Co. v. United Industries, 315 F.3d 264, 272 (4th Cir.2002). The challenge in this case is to prove that the advertisement or the mailer is intended to mislead or confuse the consumers upon a claim of implied falsehood. In short, a court may find the mailer statements literally false but absent a literal falsehood, statements can only be said impliedly misleading if presented with evidence of actual consumer deception. PBM Products LLC PBM LLC v. Mead Johnson Company, No. 10–1421 (4th Cir. 2011). In your case, since Pepsi did not literally and expressly stated that Coca Cola is harmful and can cause obesity, the company needs to supply evidence that the misleading statements made through the mailer confused and deceived the consumers. The court must determine if claims are made unambiguous and false. There are times that a literally false message may either be explicit or conveyed by necessary implication only. If advertisement is considered in its entirety, the consumers will know that the claim is clear and unambiguous. In the case of the mailer statements made by Pepsi, there is no express statement that Coca Cola is harmful and can cause obesity. But the relationship of the statements made shows that if Coca Cola has higher sugar content than Pepsi, then consumers who are drinking Coca Cola products are more likely to become obese than those drinking Pepsi products. In a decision rendered by the United States Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit, a jury found that Mead Johnson had engaged in false advertising. The district court issued an injunction prohibiting Mead Johnson from making similar claims. PBM Products LLC PBM LLC v. Mead Johnson Company, No. 10–1421 (4th Cir. 2011). According to the district court, false advertising is substantially synonymous with lying. The decision even stated that under the Virginia Law, a defamation plaintiff “first must show that a defendant has published a false factual statement that concerns and harms the plaintiff or its reputation.” Therefore, Coca Cola must establish that the statements in the mailer concern and harm the reputation of Coca Cola as a company. Concerning the second question, the Supreme Court explained that evidence is admissible under Rule 702 if it rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579, 597 (1993). The Federal Rule of Evidence Rule 702 stated that expert testimony is admissible if it will assist the trier of fact and is (1) “based upon sufficient facts or data,” (2) “the product of reliable principles and methods,” and (3) “the principles and methods [have been applied] reliably to the facts of the case.” Fed.R.Evid. 702. The Coca Cola Company should therefore make sure that the surveys conducted are product of dependable and trustworthy methods and are reliable to the facts of the case. The reason for this is because expert witnesses have great potential and power to persuade the jury. Thus the court needs to protect and make sure that all scientific testimonies must not only be relevant but also reliable. In the case of PBM Products v. Mead Johnson (2011), the defendant Mead Johnson contended that the surveys conducted were unreliable and irrelevant. But the district court concluded that even if Mead Johnson pointed out numerous ways in which the surveys could have been conducted differently, the arguments presented were not able to demonstrate that they are not reliable and relevant. Therefore, the burden of proof lies to those who question the reliability and relevance of expert surveys as admissible evidences. Conclusion Therefore, given the facts of the case of Coca Cola against Pepsi, the case will prosper. Based on the Lanham Act, the false advertising of Pepsi by distributing mailer will definitely be punished under the Act. It is clear even if Pepsi has not directly or expressly stated in the commercial campaign that Coca Cola is harmful and can cause obesity, they can be held liable. The Coca Cola Company can present evidence that the consumers were mislead and their company’s reputation has been harmed. The surveys conducted can be admissible as evidence. It is important that the company can establish that these surveys are reliable and relevant to the case. These evidences will be admissible according to the Federal Rule of Evidence Rule 702. Recommendation I recommend that your company files an action against Pepsi for false advertising. The company can claim for damages and ask the court to issue an injunction against Pepsi. I recommend that your company should produce the evidences to support the claim for false advertising against Pepsi. References: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579, 597 (1993) Federal Rule of Evidence Rule 702 PBM Products LLC PBM LLC v. Mead Johnson Company, No. 10–1421 (4th Cir. 2011) Scotts Co. v. United Industries, 315 F.3d 264, 272 (4th Cir.2002) Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Charging Pepsi with False Advertising

Investigating of British Consumer Behavior for Red Bull

No study is available that particularly deals with consumer behaviour towards RED BULL.... With the aim to gain an insight in to British consumer behavior towards RED BULL, four objectives have been set.... This would be a study where data would be collected through both quantitative and qualitative methods....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

Coca-Cola against Pepsi

Will the surveys of Coca Cola consumer experts be admitted to court as substantial evidence of false advertising against Pepsi?... Statement of Facts This office is considering whether to prosecute the Pepsi company for false advertising.... Discussion It is very clear that Pepsi committed false advertising by distributing mailer that claimed Coca Cola's products can cause obesity.... Lanham Act prohibits the false or misleading representation of fact by way of commercial advertising or promotion which misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities or geographic origin of another person's goods, services and even commercial activities....
4 Pages (1000 words) Term Paper

We no Longer Live in a Society of Producers; We Live in a Society of Consumers

We no longer live in a society of producers; ... he world until the nineteenth century was the world of agriculture.... Majority of the people were farmers during that period and agriculture was the major revenue source for them.... ... ... ... “We no longer live in a society of producers; we live in a society of consumers” ...
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Integrated Organisational Communication

Previously, different aspects of marketing communication like selling activities, direct marketing, sales promotion, Internet advertising, etc were handled by experts of the respective fields.... This essay "Integrated Organisational Communication" discusses one of the most important elements for the financial success of a company, and its significance has grown in this era of globalization when competition is becoming intense in the global market....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Marketing Communications

Marketing and advertising is a very vast field of science, dealing with human psychology and profit maximization.... In order to specifically proof my point of view that advertisements really mould consumer mindset via false claims and inefficient marketing practices, I have tried to gather examples from every walk of lives that may influence the over all market segment and general practice of the companies....
13 Pages (3250 words) Report

We No Longer Live in a Society of Producers; We Live in a Society of Consumers

This report "We No Longer Live in a Society of Producers; We Live in a Society of Consumers" discusses economic principles and business principles that are changing day by day as a result of the development of new technologies and changing lifestyles of the people.... ... ... ... Business people were interested in increasing production in the past; however, they are currently trying to strengthen their marketing activities....
13 Pages (3250 words) Report

Social Media Marketing Tool Used by Coca Cola

Therefore, it will illustrate various risk factors and their solutions in terms of using social media in their marketing and advertising strategy.... The paper "Social Media Marketing Tool Used by Coca Cola " is a perfect example of a case study on marketing.... The essay is focused on exploring the influence of social media strategies on the marketing and advertisement procedure of The Coca-Cola Company....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Madonna and Postmodernism with Explotation of Sexuality to Meet a Bottom Line

"Madonna and Postmodernism with Exploitation of Sexuality to Meet a Bottom Line" paper states that Madonna's history is one of continual recreation and reproduction of her image.... But that image has always been a mere surface glean on top of a deep-seated money-making machine.... ... ... ... Some term Madonna as a postmodernist icon in the way she has been able to consistently reinvent herself to meet the changing modes of music styles over the years....
28 Pages (7000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us