StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Philosophy Critical Thinking Issues - Scholarship Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay "Philosophy Critical Thinking Issues" focuses on the critical analysis of the major issues on philosophy critical thinking. "Barry is unhappy because he can’t buy the house wanted now". This is an argument. This statement simply tells that Barry is unhappy…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.3% of users find it useful
Philosophy Critical Thinking Issues
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Philosophy Critical Thinking Issues"

Answer all questions. This assessment task is out of 30 marks, and is worth 30% of the assessment for the QUESTION 4 marks] Give an example of (i) an argument and (ii) an explanation that could be given for the following statement. Barry is unhappy Explain what makes (i) an argument and (ii) an explanation. (i) "Barry is unhappy because he can't buy the house wanted now." This is an argument. This statement simply tells that Barry is unhappy because he cannot purchase the house he wanted. It does not explain the reason as to why Barry cannot buy the house or what logical events took place for this outcome to have happened. Remember an argument simply tries to convince you without logical explanation. (ii) "Barry is unhappy since his home loan was disapproved due to a low credit score. Because of this he will not be able to purchase the house he wanted." This is an explanation. It properly explains that the bank disapproved Barry's home loan application and therefore he will not be able to purchase the house he wanted which is why Barry is unhappy. This is an explanation. It explains what events took place that is causing Barry's unhappiness. The statement here is not trying to convince you rather it provides the logical reasoning behind the unhappiness. QUESTION 2: [5 marks] Standardize the following arguments. State whether any premises on the same level are linked or convergent. i. The trains in NSW never run on time, and it is a basic obligation of the state government to ensure that public transport is reliable. So the government in NSW could be in trouble at the next election, since people aren't going to vote for a government that can't meet its basic obligations. 1:1 Trains in NSW never run on time. 1:2 It is government's basic obligation to ensure reliable transport. 2: This government could be in trouble in the next election. C: People will not vote for a government that cannot meet basic obligations. ii. If you don't have your mobile phone, then you won't be able to call home unless you can find a pay phone. And you won't be able to find a payphone, because there aren't any around here anymore. So you won't be able to call home, because you don't have your mobile phone, since you left it at work. 1: You left your mobile at work. 2:1 To call home you would have to find a pay phone. 2:2 There are not any payphones around here. C: Without a mobile phone you cannot call home from anywhere. The premises are convergent. In the first argument the movement is 1.1, 1.2 and 2 and in the second argument the movement is 1, 2.1 and 2.2. Both arguments have two premises. The first argument has two parts of the first premises and the second argument has two parts in the second premises. Since the structure is different of the two premises, they are convergent on the same level. QUESTION 3: [5 marks] Standardize the target argument and counterargument in the following passage. Include any counterconsiderations and state whether any premises on the same level are linked or convergent. Supporters of the Atkins diet argue that following a high protein, low carbohydrate diet such as the Atkins diet is the best way to lose weight, since on that diet you cut out carbohydrates and it is carbohydrates that are responsible for weight gain. Further evidence they give that the Atkins diet is the way to go is the large number of celebrities who follow it. But nutritionists argue that although the Atkins diet may show immediate results, it is not the best way to lose weight. It is not safe, since eating a lot of protein-rich foods can increase the risk of heart disease, and cutting out carbohydrates increases the risk of some forms of cancer. Also, people who lose weight gradually on more conventional weight-loss plans are more likely to keep the weight off in the long term. Argument: (Atkins Diet) 1: On that diet you cut out carbohydrates and it is carbohydrates that are responsible for weight gain. 2: There is a large number of Celebrities who follow this diet. C: Supporters of the Atkins diet argue that following a high protein, low carbohydrate diet such as the Atkins diet is the best way to lose weight. Counterargument (Conventional Diet) 1.1: Eating a lot of protein-rich foods can increase the risk of heart disease. 1.2: Cutting out carbohydrates increases the risk of some forms of cancer. [cc] Nutritionists argue that although the Atkins diet may show immediate results, it is not the best way to lose weight. C People who lose weight gradually on more conventional weight-loss plans are more likely to keep the weight off in the long term. The counterargument does not react directly to the one premise given. Instead it offers two reasons to believe that why the Atkins' diet would not be the best way to go. It provides an alternate solution to what is being offered by the supporters of the Atkins diet, Counter arguments do not have to respond directly. There is a counter consideration in the counterargument. It is admitted that even though the Atkins' diet may show immediate results, but it if you follow the more conventional diet plan loosing weight gradually it will last longer. QUESTION 4 [3 marks] Give THREE examples of conditional statements to which someone who is wearing shoes but no socks would be a counterexample. 1. All children wear shoes with socks. 2. If shoes are worn without socks, it just not considered proper. 3. All Blue-collar workers will normally consider socks and shoes together to be part of formal attire. QUESTION 5 [2 marks] Give an example of an argument with the form "affirming the sufficient condition" and the conclusion: C: Joan won't win the prize If Joan doesn't compete fairly, than she cannot winnn the prize. She cheated off of another student, so Joan wont win the prize. This would be an affirming sufficient condition for Joan not to win the prize. The condition is that she cannot cheat off of another student and has to compete in the competition fairly, but since she did cheat (there by ignoring the condition to win) this affirms her failure. Conditions always begin with "if" or "then". They identify that if something will happen only than the second part of the sentence will take place. QUESTION 6 [4 marks] Standardise the following argument. State the form (e.g. affirming the necessary) of any conditional arguments or subarguments, and state whether they are valid or invalid. If Alf isn't wearing a tie, he won't be allowed in. But he is wearing a tie, since he's wearing a jacket and Alf only wears a jacket if he's wearing a tie. So he'll be allowed in. 1.1 Alf is not wearing a tie, he wont be allowed inside. 2. Alf is wearing a jacket. 2.1 Alf only wears the jacket with a tie. C. Alf is wearing a tie and he will be allowed in. 1.1 is the affirming condition without which nothing can happen. Than the premise starts at 2 and the structure of the premise is on the same level. Since Alf is wearing a tie and he will be allowed in that is the conclusion to all this. Therefore this argument is valid, since the truth of the premises is guaranteeing the truth of the conclusion. Remember 1.1 is the affirming condition it is not part of the premise. QUESTION 7 [5 marks] i. Give an example of (a) a standardised inductive argument, and (b) a standardised deductive argument, which could be given to support the conclusion: C: All drummers are smart. ii. Explain your answers in part (i): What makes argument (a) inductive and argument (b) deductive Deductive: 1.1: Worldwide drummer association held an annual exam. 1.2: Most of the drummers passed with marks above 90%. C. All drummers must be smart. The argument from 1.1 an1.2 is a valid deductive argument. It supports the conclusion. Further explanation is given below. The second example contains both a deductive and an inductive argument. Inductive: 1.1 The world drummer association has confirmed the test results. 2.1 Every drummer in the world attended the exam. 2.2 Most drummers passed with over 90%. C. All drummers must be smart. In this situation, 1.1 and 2.1 are the deductive arguments. However this whole premise is valid and from 2.1 to 2.2 the premises are valid inductive argument. Remember that argument whose conclusion is supposed to follow, with surety from its premise is a deductive one. Only when all the drummers took the exam was the association able to confirm that most drummers passed with over 90%. Which in supports the conclusion that all drummers are smart. QUESTION 8 [2 marks] i. Give an example of an argument that could be standardised with the following premise numbers, where 1 and 2 are linked, and 3 is convergent with them: 1.1 Darryl did not iron her cloths. 1 She went to her friend's house. 2 She will borrow an ironed suit from her friend. 3 She never goes to work without ironed cloths. C: Darryl will be late for work. Premises 1and 2 are linked they are part of the same activity that caused 1.1. They in turn explain why 1.1 happened. However premises 3 is convergent, it is about what happens or never happens if 1.1 takes place. It is no part of the same thinking. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Philosophy Critical Thinking Scholarship Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Philosophy Critical Thinking Scholarship Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1519479-philosophy-critical-thinking
(Philosophy Critical Thinking Scholarship Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Philosophy Critical Thinking Scholarship Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1519479-philosophy-critical-thinking.
“Philosophy Critical Thinking Scholarship Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1519479-philosophy-critical-thinking.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Philosophy Critical Thinking Issues

Educational Philosophy

However, education issues were not strangers to the classical philosophers, such as Plato, Aristotle and Socrates, and the more recent stalwarts, like Kant and Dewey.... The paper 'Educational philosophy' states that philosophy is of great significance in education.... Verily it is education philosophy that enables a school, district, state or nation to segregate the skills and information that a student is to imbibe and the manner in which these are to be learned....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Why Is Philosophy Valuable

Philosophers are inveterate askers of questions, people who find intractable problems and issues in what to others seems obvious and utterly uncontroversial.... So to approach the study of philosophy with the expectation of finding a coolly dispassionate endeavor governed by strict laws of logic and marked by widespread agreement on fundamental issues is to seriously misunderstand its nature and underestimate its difficulty.... Philosophy is valuable because it represents a form of thinking....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

What is Augustinian political philosophy

n general the whole political philosophy of the Medieval.... We can observe connection between philosophy and political philosophy, which is due to the fact that philosophy is always influenced and even changed but policy as it exists in society, in Medieval political philosophy focused on several primary questions.... he second important question of political philosophy of the Medieval period is that of the essence of human happiness....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

The Concept of Dualism According to Descartes

It must be noted that dualist principles attribute almost equal powers to the opposing forces, whose balance is critical for the existence of the world.... He has explained his concept of dualism in detail so that it makes sense to his readers who may be inclined to approach philosophy with a critical and analytical mind.... This essay "Descartes' Dualism" discusses Descartes who developed a new way of approaching science and philosophy.... He was instrumental in proving that philosophy can be developed as one develops scientific principles....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Critical Thinking Philosophy

In the essay "critical thinking Philosophy" it is stated that critical thinking is essential as a tool of inquiry.... From this essay it is clear that critical thinking is a liberating force in education and a powerful resource in one's personal and civic life.... According to the essay findings, to be able to think clearly and rationally implies the presence of critical thinking in an individual.... From the essay "critical thinking Philosophy" it is clear that the ability to apply independent logic and rationale behind any idea is indicative of critical thinking....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Dangerous Factors of Philosophy

Probably, it would be better to ask why too much thinking causes immense intellectual strain, a basis for various philosophers going bonkers.... From the paper "Dangerous Factors of philosophy" it is clear that it would be essential for philosophers to notice that some facts or even truths cannot be broken down any further.... philosophy tries to play with words hence turning the meanings of very common words to complex ones that are harder to comprehend....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Philosophy of Law Issues

The essay "Philosophy of Law issues" presents philosophic points of view on the subject of law.... It is based on philosophy as talked about by eminent thinkers, and its very features emanate a sort of philosophical thinking based on what law exactly is.... philosophy of law thus boils down to the combination of concepts and theories that assist in the understanding of the very nature of law, the command that it holds within the society as well as the sources of its authority (Julius)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Berkeleys Contention on Unnecessary Abstractions in Philosophy

It is in this regard that the main focus of this research paper is to defend philosophy against the said charge by stating a position of endorsement and by showing the metaphysical and epistemological issues involved, that is to say, whether abstractions are epistemologically necessary, and whether Berkeley's metaphysical charges were correct.... o start with, the metaphysical and epistemological issues involved in Berkeley's charge, as opposed to his materialist predecessors, aims to defend idealism and immaterialism....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us