StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Sixth Amendment - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Each of the factors and processes that compose criminal trials are contained in the Sixth Amendment. These processes contain the right to a jury and…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.7% of users find it useful
Sixth Amendment
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Sixth Amendment"

The Sixth Amendment The Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution guarantees the right of an accused person to a fair trial within a reasonable time. Each of the factors and processes that compose criminal trials are contained in the Sixth Amendment. These processes contain the right to a jury and public trial, to be “informed of the nature and cause of the accusation”, to be able to confront “witnesses against him”, to be provided with facilities to obtain witnesses and to have the right to legal representation.

(US Constitution, Sixth Amendment) The right to a speedy and public trial has two important aims. The right to a speedy trial is calculated to ensure that the accused is not unduly remanded in custody while awaiting trial. It safeguards against the possibility that an innocent person should have a criminal charge hanging over his head for an unreasonable period of time. (Head) The requirement for a public trial ensures that the judicial process is accountable and that under public scrutiny a public record of the trial will aid in judicial review of the process via the appellate system.

The right to an impartial jury is calculated to further ensure that the criminal trial process is free of prejudices and unfairness. Jury selection as practiced reflects the intent of the Sixth Amendment by providing a vetting process that safeguard against jurors serving who might be predisposed to prejudices against the accused person, the victims or the criminal process in general. (Head) It also attempts to aid in the selection of a jurors who have not been or will not be influenced by media reports so that the accused will only be judged by the facts presented in evidence at his or her trial.

The right to confront witnesses is crucial to the element of fairness within the ambit of the Sixth Amendment. It lays the groundwork by which the prosecution is required to meet the burden of proof. At a trial the witnesses are required to provide sworn testimony of the criminal claim with the accused present. The right to confront those witnesses gives way to the practice in which the accused if he decides may either by himself or through his legal council cross-examine those witnesses. The idea is to test the veracity of the evidence and to ensure that the witnesses are credible.

By the same measure the accused is entitled to call his own witnesses if he deems necessary. For instance he might be able to present alibi evidence capable of proving that he could not have committed the crime since he was not in the vicinity of the crime scene at the relevant time. The assistance of council clause contained in the Sixth Amendment is crucial to the fairness and efficiency of the criminal trial process. (Head) This right to assistance of council is reflected in the Miranda warnings given to persons upon arrest and indicates the importance of permitting the accused person to have access to legal council from the moment of arrest to the conclusion of the criminal prosecution process.

Question One Arrest is the process by which the accused person is initially informed that he or she is suspected of having committed an offence and will usually be at least temporarily deprived of his or her liberty. (Hall, 406) Arrest, unless executed pursuant to a warrant for a refugee who has been previously convicted is primarily used in the initial stages of the prosecutorial process. In other words an arrest typically takes place prior to the defendant’s formal charge. Following an arrest the accused person is usually charged with an offence and can be admitted to bail pending the trial or he can be remanded in custody awaiting the trial.

This is the pre-trial detention stage. (Hall, 412) The arrest is executed pursuant to an investigation of a criminal offence and detention is the process that precedes the prosecution of the criminal offence and this is the most basic distinction between arrest and detention.Question Two Carl’s response to finding his wife in bed with John could reasonably be defined as provocation, an essential element for the finding of guilt on a charge of voluntary manslaughter. (Hall, 98-100) The question turns on whether or not a reasonable person would have lost control in the circumstances in which Carl did.

Voluntary manslaughter is established if one of two elements are present. They are adequate cause and sudden passion. Adequate cause will be established if the defendant is suddenly confronted with a situation that causes anxiety, fear or anger to such a degree that he is provoked to act as Carl did. However, it is important that there is no time to reconsider otherwise premeditation, a prerequisite for murder will be present. (Hall, 98-100) It might be argued that Beth’s attempt to dissuade Carl could have given him time to reconsider and therefore introduce the element of premeditation.

However, it is uncertain whether or not Carl had been dissuaded since the gun went off in a struggle and ultimately struck and killed John. It would appear that the killing was negligent and the charge should therefore be reduced to involuntary manslaughter. (Hall, 98-100) Beth however does not incur criminal liability since her part in the shooting was purely for the purpose of preventing a crime altogether. Any act in anticipation of defending the life or property of another is a defence to criminal offences.

(Hall, 223) BibliographyHall, Daniel. (2004) Criminal Law and Procedure. Dehmar Learning.Head, Tom. (n.d.) The Sixth Amendment. Available online at: http://civilliberty.about.com/od/lawenforcementterrorism/p/6th_amendment.htm Retrieved May 16, 2008

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Sixth Amendment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Sixth Amendment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1546330-sixth-amendment
(Sixth Amendment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
Sixth Amendment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1546330-sixth-amendment.
“Sixth Amendment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1546330-sixth-amendment.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Sixth Amendment

Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial - Illegitimate use of continuances

Wingo test has been now applied to cases of Sixth Amendment claims.... Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial - Illegitimate use of continuances Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial - Illegitimate use of continuances In Barker v.... Wingo test has been now applied to cases of Sixth Amendment claims (Herman, 2006)....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

4th, 5th, 6th Amendments

The Fourth, Fifth to Sixth Amendment of the Bill Rights relate to the rights of an individual when he or she is free from illegal seizures from the statue and is guaranteed to a fair and speedy trial when accused of a crime that would his put full enjoyment to life, liberty and… “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly Discussion of the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments of the Bill of Rights The Fourth, Fifth to Sixth Amendment of the Bill Rights relate to the rights of an individual when he or she is free from illegal seizures from the statue and is guaranteed to a fair and speedy trial when accused of a crime that would his put full enjoyment to life, liberty and property in peril....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

The Right to Counsel in The US

2d 674 (1984), the United States Supreme Court was confronted with the issue of determining the tests for establishing when bad lawyering contravenes the rights of a defendant as established under the Sixth Amendment (Steiker 468).... By contrast, Justice Marshall led the dissenting opinion by arguing that the new test would yield very limited positive outcomes as far as the provisions of the Sixth Amendment rights are concerned.... In the view of the dissenters, the performance threshold was so flexible that, in reality, it would not work because: a) of problems in determining the competence of an attorney and b) different courts and tests for bad legal representation would yield substantial variations in the application of the Sixth Amendment....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment Rights

The court rejected The issue the case was whether the Fourth amendment of U.... Moreover, the signed confessions contained a clause that, stated that the accused was aware of his rights during the interrogation as provided in the Fifth amendment of the U.... Therefore, in summary the issue was, whether police officers are mandated notifying the accused person in their custody of his/her rights as provided for by the Fifth amendment...
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Arrest of Mr Ballew for Conferring a Misdeed for Demonstrating a Profane Movement Film

In delivering its ruling, the Court of Supreme decided that a five-person jury does not meet the sacred edge or constitutional requirements as provided by the Sixth Amendment of the United States' constitution that applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.... Georgia issue of whether a criminal trial by a state, which constrained a jury to five denied the charged individual a right enshrined in the constitution and provided to him/her by the sixth & Fourteenth Amendments disregarded such secured rights (Ballew v....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment

A Number of Landmark Court Decisions

The paper 'A Number of Landmark Court Decisions' focuses on the Court, with the arguable exception of its decision in Betts which has progressively extended the reach of the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel clause to any proceeding that prospectively involves incarceration.... In decisions reaching back to the 1950s, the Court firmly established a Sixth Amendment right to counsel in cases involving defendants who were mentally retarded or otherwise of diminished mental capacity....
12 Pages (3000 words) Term Paper

Analysis of Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 Case

n making it it's ruling, the Supreme Court held that a five bench jury doesn't meet the constitutional threshold guarantee as stipulated by the Sixth Amendment of the U.... Ballew was convicted for his crime under the Georgia law but he appeared before the Court of Appeal of the state of Georgia claiming that a trial before a jury compromising of less than six jury persons was unconstitutional; the evidence warranting his conviction was insufficient and the film showed was not obscene as per the First amendment....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

American Constitution Law 4 J

Generally speaking, the Sixth Amendment guarantees that ‘in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right… to have Assistance of Counsel for his defence” (Mason & Beaney 1968).... ?? Mason & Beaney 1968) Thus, even when Janet has enough resources to hire a counsel, based on probable cause, her right to Sixth Amendment still may be denied.... Sixth Amendment categorically protects the destitute from unfair trial, which implies that if the petitioner doesn't have enough resources to hire a counselor, the judge must assign an attorney who must be paid for by the government resources....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us