StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Free Will and Determinism - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Free Will and Determinism " highlights that generally speaking, even though the dilemma of free will and world determinism seems to be irresolvable because people’s personal beliefs about the issue often don’t let them see the big picture…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.9% of users find it useful
Free Will and Determinism
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Free Will and Determinism"

Free Will and Determinism Even though the dilemma of free will and world determinism seems to be irresolvable, because people’s personal beliefs about the issue often don’t let them see the big picture. So it is more likely that the problem is about people’s beliefs and their unwillingness to accept any facts that contradict their assumptions on the matter. That’s why I think that the position of Compatibilists is the most comprehensive one, because in fact both statements that human beings have free will and that the world is deterministic in fact are absolutely compatible with each other (hence, I reject the third statement that claims that free will is incompatible with determinism) and multiple simple observations of this world might prove it. The position of Compatibilists, which I endorse, requires that the two statements concerning both human’s free will and the world’s determinism are truthful. Thus they both must be proven first. In order to assert that the world is deterministic and human beings live according to its rules and some either physical or metaphysical laws, we should take a look at humans’ lives and the nature itself. First of all, human beings mostly live in societies, where they are supposed to follow common rules of living and obey legal laws. These factors determine human lives on the most obvious level. We, people, have wishes and desires and most of them concern social popularity, career success, or creation of family. However, all these wishes are based on the fact that we live in society, which dictates us what we are supposed to want and establishes norms. For instance, I don’t eat insects, because in my culture, where I have been raised, eating insects it is not appropriate. This means that I am determined by my culture and society. And when I see an insect I decide not to eat it, but not because I just don’t want to do it for no reasons, but because I’ve been taught not to want it. However, some other people eat insects and they actually like it, so their culture, where everyone eats insects, determines their tastes. Considering more basic level of the world’s determination, all human beings live in the universe that works according to some universal physical laws, which are obligatory for everybody. We can’t fight natural disasters (which frequently significantly determine human lives), we can’t stop the process of dying, and we also are not able not to get down to the ground after we jumped. Thus all these physical evidences prove that there are so many forces in the universe that we can’t ignore under any circumstances ever. Human free will also works, as far as people indeed make their own decisions and they are able to change them and turn their lives around. However, in terms of human free will I’d rather be in favor of the following idea suggested by Friedrich Nietzsche, although he actually declined the typical concept of free will, still I think his definition is clear and describes my position. He said that free will means being responsible for your decisions and make changes, to be free both from anything and for something. Because “no one is responsible for man’s being there at all, for his being such-and-such, or for his being in these circumstances or in this environment. The fatality of his essence is not to be disentangled from the fatality of all that has been and will be” (Nietzsche 1954). In fact this means that even though a human being is happened to live in this world, which determines everything that happens, still the person is responsible for one’s own existence and is able to make choices and act within the scopes of all the conditions and circumstances one faces throughout one’s lifetime. Thus I believe that what we consider as freedom in fact is the necessity we are aware of. This means that freedom and the thing that we call “free will” is possible just in case we’re aware of the factors that limit us in our actions and we can chose not to follow the rules. We can eat insects once we understand that it was our society that told us not to eat them because they are disgusting, especially for eating. We also might make more global decisions and stop the determinacy of this world by voluntary dying; in this case determinism of nature embodied in the fact that human beings die under certain circumstances works along with human free will to end up life voluntary. However, I believe that the most significant argument that might be presented by Compatibilists’ opponents concerns the antinomy that lies behind the assertion that free will is the necessity that we aware of, which is Descartes’ thesis (Christofidou 2009). The point is that necessity requires absence of any freedom at all. Hence, if the world is deterministic, human intelligence that makes decisions is also a consequence of determinism and is being created by some outside factors; for instance, by brain activity and nothing else, which makes human mind a physical phenomenon. The answer of the proponent of Compatibilists would be that indeed there is a possibility that human mind might be not only a kind of brain activity but also it might result from environment and circumstances that people learn from. However, human mind is able to learn and analyze, so once a person realizes the deterministic essence of everything, one becomes able to learn how to get rid of the limits that deterministic factors place on one’s life. For instance, if a person doesn’t like the fact that society determines his life, he is free to go and become an ascetic in case he believes it would set him free; and this is how free will in fact works in deterministic world. Thus I think that free will and determinism definitely work in this world, because in fact this position meets less contradiction from both hard determinists and libertarians. The claim is the best solution for the dilemma; however, people will probably never find a common universal consensus for the problem of free will and determinism. References Christofidou, A. (2009).“Descartes on Freedom, Truth, and Goodness”. Noûs. 43, n.pag. Nietzsche, Friedrich. (1954). Twilight of the Idols, tr. Walter Kaufmann, in The Portable Nietzsche. New York: Viking Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The problem of free will arises from three initially plausible Essay - 2”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1686390-the-problem-of-free-will-arises-from-three-initially-plausible-assumptions-1-human-beings-have-free-will-2-the-world-is-deterministic-3-free-will-is-incompatible-with-determinism
(The Problem of Free Will Arises from Three Initially Plausible Essay - 2)
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1686390-the-problem-of-free-will-arises-from-three-initially-plausible-assumptions-1-human-beings-have-free-will-2-the-world-is-deterministic-3-free-will-is-incompatible-with-determinism.
“The Problem of Free Will Arises from Three Initially Plausible Essay - 2”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1686390-the-problem-of-free-will-arises-from-three-initially-plausible-assumptions-1-human-beings-have-free-will-2-the-world-is-deterministic-3-free-will-is-incompatible-with-determinism.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Free Will and Determinism

Can Compatibilism be Defended

is on the classical definitions of Free Will and Determinism, the issue of compatibilism, on defining compatibilism using simple definitions of Free Will and Determinism and will then proceed to expose weaknesses in the compatibilist line.... As it stands, both Free Will and Determinism are well-defined concepts.... Compatibilism stands in the middle in an effort to bridge the gap between Free Will and Determinism.... In my humble opinion, compatibilism is merely a way of telling both Free Will and Determinism proponents that they are wrong to a certain extent and right in other respects....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Writing Research Paper

The movie shows that a mysterious ‘organization', the Adjustment Bureau, has determined every human's future from before.... ... ... This makes one doubt whether humans make their own choices or whether those choices are already made for them....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Read: women's free will and determinism. the pages are attach. follow

Free Will and Determinism: A Dialogue.... Frederick on the other hand argues that all things that happen are not pre-determined and Freewill and determinism Lecturer In this document, the examines whether or not determinism and freewill exist, and if the two are compatible.... Based on the arguments above, it is clear that the author wanted to show the controversy freewill and determinism.... Frederick on the other hand argues that all things that happen are not pre-determined and hence for him, determinism is not true and therefore not all actions have an underlying cause....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Has Ayer Shown That the Causal Determinism Is Compatible with Free Will

There are different philosophical inferences made regarding the issue of Free Will and Determinism.... Ayer, in his philosophical essays, tries to reestablish the argument of Free Will and Determinism compatibility (Ayer 255).... Accordingly, Ayer's idea of making Free Will and Determinism compatible is a semantics trick.... However, under such circumstances, one may not relate Free Will and Determinism.... He depicts free will, and determinism is perfectly compatible....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Opinion on Philosophical Theories

This essay, Opinion on Philosophical Theories, declares that Free Will and Determinism are essential components of existentialism.... Free Will and Determinism versus Existentialism Free Will and Determinism are essential components of existentialism.... There are constraints that limit the existence of freedom, so people do not have an exclusive advantage to exercise Free Will and Determinism (Christian, 2008).... Responsibility and control define Free Will and Determinism, but they are done with consciousness featured in existentialism as proposed by Jean Paul Sartre....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Problem of free will

To settle this problem, it is necessary to reject some concepts or demonstrate that all the concepts of Free Will and Determinism are consistent (Rauhut 2010).... In this argument, I will reject the view that free will is incompatible with determinism.... free will is the ability of an individual to exercise control in their acts in a manner.... Moral responsibility arises from the ability to do right or wrong and be accountable for it, which makes free will indispensable....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Definition and Facts of Freedom and Determinism

he Four definitionsThe four definitions of Free Will and Determinism basically belong to (1 ) The Free willist school (2) The hard Determinist school (3) The soft Determinist school and lastly the existentialist school, In his book, Free Will and Determinism: A Dialogue (1980), Williams, Clifford has explained the first three schools very deftly.... In Clifford's book, we get involved in a debate about Free Will and Determinism by Frederick, a Free-willist, Daniel, a Determinist, and Carolyn, a Compatibilist ('Compatibilism' is recognized also as "soft determinism" and most notably defended by Hume who held that Free Will and Determinism are friendly, cf....
9 Pages (2250 words) Literature review

Free Will and Determinism - Ways in Which Human Beings Are Genuinely Free

This paper "Free Will and Determinism - Ways in Which Human Beings Are Genuinely Free" explores how human beings can be genuinely free.... This is essentially the compatibility approach contrary to the traditional incompatibility which is inherently deterministic and suggests that Free Will and Determinism are incompatible (Sarkissian, et al.... (2007), any view that human beings do not have free will and that there is incompatibilism is regarded as hard incompatibilism....
8 Pages (2000 words) Literature review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us