StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Analysis on Humans and Animals - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The "Analysis on Humans and Animals" research paper is focused on a difficult moral and ethical issue: whether the killing of an animal for human gastronomy is justified or not. The issue is controversial, thus it is essential to consider the ideas of famous thinkers…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.4% of users find it useful
Analysis on Humans and Animals
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Analysis on Humans and Animals"

Analysis on Humans and Animals Introduction This research paper is focused on a difficult moral and ethical issue: whether killing of an animal for human gastronomy is justified or not. The issue is controversial, thus it is essential to consider the ideas of famous thinkers. The discussion is based on comparison of Elizabeth Costello ideas on humans and animals with ideas expressed by J. Locke, Wallace and Nagel. Costello in Lesson 3 “The Lives of Animals: The Philosophers and the Animals” considers philosophers’ ideas on animals. Such great thinkers as Augustine, Aquinas, and Aristotle claimed that animals have no souls (Coetzee, p. 66-67). The epoch of Enlightenment and its representatives Descartes and Kant tended to the idea that humans are first of all rational beings; philosophers underlined a crucial role of ratio (Coetzee, p. 66-67). Costello made this idea a ground for her support of animals: if humans are rational beings then how it is possible to slaughter and oppress animals? She also compared attitude towards animals in modern world with Holocaust. Certainly, this comparison is not usual but if animals are living creatures, which feel pain and suffer from it, such idea seems rational. Furthermore modern people prefer to pretend being unaware of slaughterhouses and factory farms like earlier people pretended not seeing ash of human bodies in the wind. It is clear, because it is really much easier not to know how this is happening, just consume having no idea about where it comes from. “The more important point here, though, is that the whole animal-cruelty-and-eating issue is not just complex, it’s also uncomfortable. It is, at any rate, uncomfortable for me, and for just about everyone I know who enjoys a variety of foods and yet does not want to see herself as cruel or unfeeling”(Wallace, p5). Costello claims that suppression of these facts is the best evidence of their horror. Following idea expressed by Costello, who is an imaginative character of novelist from the book by John Coetzee, we’ll develop her idea basing on works by Locke, Wallace and Nagel. Comparison of ideas on animals’ oppression by humans Let us give a brief overview of the abovementioned works, which will be a basis for our research. Thomas Nagel in his article “What is like to be a bat?” draws parallels between a man and a bat. He is concentrated mainly on conscious exploration. Nagel underlines that conscious is presented in animals as well as in humans. Why bats, actually? In accordance with the scientist, bats are closely related to humans (Nagel, p45). They feel pain, fear, anger, hunger, like we do. Nevertheless bats’ experiences are subjective in every aspect; therefore we can’t conceive them to a proper extent. The author grounds his claims on suggestion of experiences’ presence in animals, which are beyond human understanding. He provides interesting examples and his arguments are unique and original. Furthermore in a simple manner he introduces deep philosophical ideas. For example, he claims that we can imagine how to be a bat, but it will only means what it would be like to be a bat for us and not what is like for a bat to be a bat (Nagel, p67). We can suppose that Nagel invented his ideas in order to support animals’ rights for existence. Humans aren’t allowed to pull out any kind of species from their being in order to satisfy gastronomic or aesthetic tastes. Costello’ ideas can be compared with ideas by Nagel while she claims that since animals are embodiment of a non rational world their consciousness can’t be totally perceived by human reason. Therefore there’s no way and justification for cruel attitude towards animals. Our research topic is also worth referring to John Locke’ work “Essay Concerning Human Understanding” (1690). Two sections from this work are of great relevance to our paper: Identity of animals and the Identity of man. When Locke talks about animals his discussion looks simple and understandable though it implies a deep sense. Locke compares animals and watch. Both of them have their own organization and require external force for their functioning. Only animal’s motion coming from within body organization and motion of watch force coming from without: “in an animal the fitness of the organization, and the motion wherein life consists, begin together, the motion coming from within; but in machines the force coming sensibly from without, is often away when the organ is in order, and well fitted to receive it” (Locke p4). Another section of Locke’s work “The identity of man” considers man like a fitly organized body. At this stage we can trace similarity with identity of animal. Nevertheless Locke considers soul as an identifier of a man. He didn’t mention presence of soul in animals. Therefore this philosopher tends to delimitation of an animal and a man, considers them to be different creatures. Only humans have soul and, according to the philosopher, this difference is very significant. As far as we can see, unlike Elizabeth Costello, ideas of Locke are directed on man supremacy. Costello’s comparisons on attitude to animals in modern world with Holocaust aren’t supported in Locke’s work. Nevertheless, his discussions to a certain extent complement Costello’s ideas. She doesn’t mention soul as a differentiator of a man and an animal unlike Locke. At this point we can suppose that in such a way Costello avoids acknowledging of an evident difference of an animal and a man. Another work by David F. Wallace “Consider the lobster” presents less philosophical ideas and grounds its discussion on the example of Maine Lobster Festival. The author asks such question: “Is it all right to boil a sentient creature alive just for our gustatory pleasure?”(Wallace, p5). Wallace raised this question and appealed to consciousness of people all over the world. He explored whether it is justified and moral to boil an animal alive (Wallace, p14). The author underlined that it’s easier to avoid responsibility and close one’s eyes on moral aspect of such kind of festival than to discuss its morality. Wallace emphasized on pain which lobsters feel while being boiled, on what they feel and the question arises: who’s responsible for pain and death of lobster: each cooker individually or the whole society, which adopts such kind of meals? Who has a right to make lobsters feel pain and how is it possible? “As you may or may not know, a certain well-known group called People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals thinks that the morality of lobster-boiling is not just a matter of individual conscience” (Wallace, p5). Ideas of Wallace are close to the ideas of Costello. Pain, fear and death of an innocent living creature, a lobster, can’t be justified only because of the fact that its brains have less neurons and pain extent experienced by lobster can’t be compared to a feeling of human pain. Neglect of moral principles in modern society is a perfect background for moral degradation, that will make us return to where we came from. Conclusion If we try to sum up and compare ideas of all four works considered about, we can surely claim that ideas of Elizabeth Costello are closely related to Nagel and Wallace. Three of them underlined subjectivity of animals’ world and experiences, they did it differently and with different accent but this idea is common in all three writings. Costello claimed that it’s impossible to interfere and destroy animals’ world for our gustatory pleasures. Humans aren’t allowed to pull out any kind of species from their being in order to satisfy gastronomic or aesthetic tastes (Coetzee, p60) Costello’ ideas can be compared with ideas by Nagel while she claims that since animals are embodiment of a non rational world their consciousness can’t be totally perceived by human reason. Negel grounds his claims on suggestion of experiences’ presence in animals, which are beyond human understanding. Costello’s comparisons on attitude to animals in modern world with Holocaust aren’t supported in Locke’s work. Locke compares animals and watch. Both of them have their own organization and require external force for their functioning. Only animal’s motion coming from within body organization and motion of watch force coming from without. Therefore there’s no way and justification for cruel attitude towards animals. Basing on the works of great philosophers, Costello raised a question which is often suppressed in modern society: oppression of animals, and any oppression is unacceptable in democratic society as it contradicts basic democratic principles. On the one hand people eat animals for surviving and as well as animals eat each other for surviving. It’s a law of nature and people can’t and won’t change it radically in order to survive. This is what the nature gave us and we have to live according to its laws. But on the other hand the issue remains controversial and generates lasting debates, which will never be stopped due to the existence of another opinion on the given matter: humanity is rational and it’s contradictory to moral values to eat living creatures. Works cited 1. Coetzee, J. M., Elizabeth Costello, New York, Viking, 2003. 2. Locke, J. Essay Concerning Human Understanding, 1690. 3. Nagel, T. “What is it like to be a bat?”The Philosophical Review LXXXIII, 4 (1974): pp. 435-50. 4. Wallace, D. “Consider the Lobster”. (2004). Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Analysis on Humans and Animals Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
Analysis on Humans and Animals Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1734495-analysis-on-humans-and-animals
(Analysis on Humans and Animals Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Analysis on Humans and Animals Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1734495-analysis-on-humans-and-animals.
“Analysis on Humans and Animals Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1734495-analysis-on-humans-and-animals.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Analysis on Humans and Animals

Analysis of Human Relationships in Balzac's The Passion in the Desert

The stronger message that Balzac tries to bring forth in this story is that feelings and love are common to humans and animals alike.... Feelings and emotions are not unique to just humans and that humans possess as much animal instinct as animals do.... animals have as much human in their feelings and expression of love.... Using the story Balzac tries to establish that underneath once all our exterior robes of civility are taken off we are all animals and possess the same instincts....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

An inhumane practice

Animal Use in Medical Research is an Inhumane Act Most of the advancements in medical sciences in the past and present are attributed to the use of animals in most experiments.... The use of animals has lead to numerous medical discoveries that were able to save many human lives in the process (Cohen and Regan 3).... hellip; However, with the emergence of animal rights groups, as well as a spreading awareness of the plight of animals under various experimentation methods, people are now getting even more conscious with the upkeep of humane treatment of all living things, including animals....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

The relationship between animal play and human play

Play in humans and animals reveal that animals are as intelligent and as evolved as humans are.... Even though their approaches are different, there is one point which they both have tried to highlight strongly and that is the relation between the play of animals and play of humans.... Relation between play of animals and play of human Huizinga, in his article “Nature and significance of play as a cultural phenomenon,” has explained how play of human beings is not just a cultural or social phenomenon but is a natural phenomenon....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Animal Experimentation

The practice of testing on animals goes back many centuries.... This event was recorded as the first known use of animals in medical research.... Today, animals are still being experimented for a variety of reasons.... Others say that animal testing has been proved worthwhile and therefore should continue, but that new laws should be made in order to prevent cruelty to laboratory animals.... (Mattingly, 1990) No doubt animals have played a vital role in almost all advancements in medicine....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

The Abuse of Animal Rights in Regard to Their Use in Testing and Financial Exploitation

The above is due to the potential use of animal research in treating heart diseases and cancer, where it has contributed by bringing chemotherapy as an option in controlling and getting rid of cancer in humans and some animals.... The author states that the negative aspects of it have led to ethical issues of violating animals by doing morally unconventional actions that lead to suffering.... In addition, research on animals allows humans to come up with new vaccines or means of preventing diseases and some conditions that cannot be handled through any other means....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

The Sole Purpose of Domesticating Animals

The paper "The Sole Purpose of Domesticating animals" explores the animals' rights.... Human beings should choose to eat the plants alone since they do not have the moral rights like the animals.... Since the sensory system of the animals is very active the humans must not kill and eat the animals.... hellip; One great philosopher that supported the eating of animals was Descartes.... On the other hand, opponents believe that animals should not be eaten as they are emotional and feel pain, just like humans....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Critically Analyse the Claim that Humans Are Political Animals

… The essay will therefore gives an analysis on the claim that human beings are animals in nature.... This paper talks that claiming that humans are political animals is true given the process through which human beings interact and coexist in their entire period of life while participating in various leaderships and rules.... They then end up living a political life while in nature they are animals.... In that case, individual liberty does not win in context of any city-state just as freedom and private ownership does not exist for animals....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Issue of Animal Rights In the Modern World

Intelligent differences between humans and animals are not a valid reason to deny the moral rights of animals.... People kill animals just to eat them.... People kill animals to create beautiful fur.... This essay stresses that the man has a high intellect and capacity for reflective activity that cannot be observed in animals.... In fact, they are not much different from animals because they lack the ability to think properly....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us