StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Crisis of Confidence: The American Military Failure in Vietnam - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay "Crisis of Confidence: The American Military Failure in Vietnam" elaborates on the fact that the United States never had a real sense of purpose in this war, and the fact that the Vietnamese were able to bog down the American military, are the key reasons why the Vietnamese were victorious in this conflict…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.5% of users find it useful
Crisis of Confidence: The American Military Failure in Vietnam
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Crisis of Confidence: The American Military Failure in Vietnam"

Your Your Crisis of Confidence: The American Military Failure in Vietnam The war in Vietnam was different from most of the other conflicts in American history. There was not a clear point of entry into the conflict – a stark contrast with the horrific night of Pearl Harbor, for example. The rationale behind United States involvement lacked the hearty sentiments of Manifest Destiny or the hated enemies Kaiser Bill or Adolf Hitler. It may have been these murky beginnings that made the war such an unpopular one, and a topic that enervated rather than energized the American public. It may have been this lack of unity regarding the Vietnam conflict that offended President Johnson, who sought to turn the conflict around and make it a positive factor in American society. The fact that the United States never had a real sense of purpose in this war, and the fact that the Vietnamese were able to bog down the American military, are the key reasons why the Vietnamese were victorious in this conflict. The conflict, of course, began when the French decided to release their colonial claims to Vietnam. The French army was driven from Vietnam in 1954, resulting in the Geneva Peace Accords. This created a temporary partition of Vietnam at the seventeenth parallel, until 1956, when nationwide elections would be held. While the Communist powers in the Soviet Union and China did want the entire nation of Vietnam to become Communist, they predicted that the 1956 election would accomplish their aims without bringing the United States into the conflict (The Wars for Vietnam: 1945 to 1975). Rather than initiate another conflict similar to Korea, the American government began a concerted effort to win the political minds of those living to the south of the Communist zone. A major part of this effort was the creation of SEATO (Southeast Asia Treaty Organization). Initially, the American efforts were successful: the 1956 elections brought Ngo Dinh Diem, a firm opponent of Communism, to power in South Vietnam (Kaiser, p. 36). However, Diem claimed that the North Vietnamese were preparing to take the southern half of Vietnam by force, and the Americans began aiding his military maneuvers against the northern half in 1957. Diem used a variety of brutal internal measures in South Vietnam to quell the Communist insurgency, including Law 10/59, which permitted authorities to hold anyone who was suspected of being a Communist indefinitely, without bringing charges (Kaiser, p. 41). Over time, Diem became increasingly autocratic, which made him an increasingly difficult leader for the United States to support. In response, the Communist insurgency began to increase the amount of violence in its protests (The Wars for Vietnam: 1945 to 1975). The National Liberation Front was the official organization for those in South Vietnam who wanted to overthrow Diem’s government. Created on December 20, 1960, the NLF had only one requirement for membership: applicants had to be opposed to Diem’s rule. While the American government scorned the NLF as a mere puppet of the North Vietnamese Communist government, giving it the slur “Viet Cong,” there are many who were inside and outside the NLF who claimed that the majority of its members were not Communists – thus showing how unpopular Diem had actually become (Kaiser, p. 44). President Kennedy’s policy toward Diem was neither full assistance nor full rejection: the United States supplied advisers and equipment to the South Vietnamese government, but did not commit a large-scale complement of troops to assist Diem’s military in its conflict against the NLF (The Wars for Vietnam: 1945 to 1975). This level of assistance was not sufficient to keep the South Vietnamese government stable. After Diem’s brother led raids on the Buddhist pagodas throughout the country, claiming that the priests were harboring Communists, there were protests throughout the country, including one in Saigon where a Buddhist priest set himself on fire. The Americans gave some of Diem’s generals support for a coup, and so on November 1, 1963, Diem and his brother were captured and later killed. On November 22, however, President Kennedy was assassinated, bringing Vice President Lyndon Johnson into the role of Chief Executive (The Wars for Vietnam: 1945 to 1975). At this point in time, there were 16,000 American military advisers stationed in Vietnam. However, the political difficulties in South Vietnam did not seem to be abating, which made many wonder what the effectiveness of those advisers was. Even before the attacks in the Gulf of Tonkin, the new President was already planning a significant increase in the American military presence in South Vietnam. Matters accelerated on August 2 and 4, 1964, when the North Vietnamese attacked an American ship in the Gulf of Tonkin. The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was the American political response, which gave the President wide-ranging executive powers to use during times of war. The military response to the attacks was a series of limited air attacks against North Vietnam. There was much dissent inside the government as to how militarily involved the next steps should be – the Joint Chiefs of Staff urged an expanded air campaign over the north, while the civilians in government wanted to be more choosy about the bombing targets. While all of this arguing was going on, the NLF attacked two American army installations in the south, which led President Johnson to institute Operation Rolling Thunder, a sustained bombing campaign, and to send significant troop increases into the south (The Wars for Vietnam: 1945 to 1975). By the end of 1965, there were 184,000 troops in Vietnam (Bailey and Kennedy, p. 872). This American adjustment in strategy led to a change in the Communist strategy as well. Because the Communists knew that the American government did not have a specific vision behind its military intervention in Vietnam, they believed that they would be able to defeat the technologically and numerically superior American forces by drawing the war out, and getting the United States into a slow, bogged-down conflict that would wear away at public opinion and political will. At the same time, the South Vietnamese became increasingly unreliable allies. After the coup that toppled Diem, the South Vietnamese government changed over and over. Rather than admit that the United States was supporting a government that had only the shakiest claims of being a stable democracy, however, President Johnson listened to the shrill claims of the far right, who claimed that if the United States pulled out of Vietnam, it would “drive America’s first line of defense back to Waikiki Beach, in Hawaii, or even to the coast of California” (Bailey and Kennedy, p. 873). By 1968, there were more than 500,000 troops in Vietnam, and the annual cost of the war was over $30 billion. However, there was no apparent end to the conflict that anyone could see. Just as important to the American defeat as the change in Vietnamese military tactics was the draining loss of morale at home. Across the world, opinion turned against the United States. There were several countries that sent home their Peace Corps volunteers. The French (who, ironically, had been the ones to lose to Vietnam in the first place) ordered NATO to leave France in 1966 (Bailey and Kennedy, p. 873). Domestically, there were many universities that had “teach-ins” as early as 1965, and as time progressed, these protests became enormous, particularly as the draft took away more and more of America’s young men (Johnson, p. 142). Many draftees fled to Canada, so that they would not have to fight in Vietnam, and others risked imprisonment by burning their draft cards in public protests. Protesters marched by the hundreds of thousands in New York City and San Francisco. Televisions teemed with images of American soldiers burning straw huts that belonged to some of the poorest people on the planet and dropping napalm on groups of civilians (Small 1998, p. 141). When the war was not on television, the hearings held by Senator Fulbright, chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations, featured famous public figures delivering antiwar sentiments in Senate hearings. Because of the sense that the government had made the war seem more winnable than it actually was, the idea of a “credibility gap” between the government and the American people grew in popularity (Bailey and Kennedy, p. 874). The opposition party in America was not the only source of doubt and division. Even the Johnson administration had misgivings about the American military’s capability to keep South Vietnam from falling to the Communists in the north. By early 1968, the Vietnam War had become the longest foreign war in the country’s history. There had been over 100,000 American troops that were killed or wounded. The United States had already dropped more bombs on Vietnam than had been dropped on all of the Axis powers during World War II (Bailey and Kennedy, p. 875). During the long duration of this war, the government had never communicated the purpose of the hostilities to the American public, and so the critics were blasting the government with questions about the value America was getting for the blood that was being shed and the money that was being drained by the conflict (Small 1994, p. 111). The Tet Offensive was the Vietnamese military campaign that exposed all of the claims of an imminent American victory as falsehoods. The Viet Cong attacked twenty-seven cities in South Vietnam, including Saigon, at once. While they were defeated and suffered heavy losses, President Johnson’s strategy of “gradual escalation” was shown to be deeply flawed. The American military leadership made a stunning request for 200,000 additional troops, and even President Johnson seemed willing to put the brakes on the war effort. This willingness was increased by a surprising challenge within Johnson’s own party in the 1968 Presidential election. Eugene McCarthy, a Senator from Minnesota, entered as a peace candidate. He won 42% of the vote in the 1968 New Hampshire primary, and seemed headed for a shocking victory against a sitting President. However, immediately after the primary, Robert F. Kennedy entered the Democratic contest, also as a peace candidate, relegating McCarthy to the side of the race (Bailey and Kennedy, p. 876). President Johnson seemed in a cul-de-sac of his own construction. How could he emerge from the Vietnam conflict honorably, but not sacrifice the chances of the Democratic Party in the 1968 election? On March 31, 1968, Johnson announced that American troop levels would freeze, allowing the South Vietnamese to take more responsibility for their own security. At the same time, peace negotiations would open with the North Vietnamese. Most stunning of all was President Johnson’s announcement that he would not seek the Democratic nomination in the 1968 election. While this announcement quieted many of the protests in the United States, the diplomatic negotiations quickly melted down over squabbles over such minutiae as the shape of the conference table (Bailey and Kennedy, p. 877). The 1968 Presidential election gave America Richard Nixon. The “Nixon Doctrine” was one of his first policy statements, namely that while the United States would honor its existing commitments in defense, in the future allies would have to fight their own wars without large numbers of American ground troops supporting them. Nixon’s idea to “Vietnamize” the war involved a gradual withdrawal of the 540,000 American troops in South Vietnam, along with an extensive training program for the South Vietnamese, so they could shoulder the defense of their own country (Bailey and Kennedy, p. 882). Nixon’s solution to the antiwar protesters at home was surprisingly condescending: he first issued an appeal to the “silent majority” – those middle-class workers sitting at home in the evening, watching television, not taking part in protests of any kind, but who supported the war effort. He sent Vice President Spiro Agnew out to deliver vicious attacks on the “misleading” media and the “effete corps of impudent snobs” and “nattering nabobs of negativism” who wanted a faster withdrawal from Vietnam (Small 1994, p. 202). The statistics do not lie, however: by January, 1970, the Vietnam War had seen over 40,000 American soldiers killed and over 250,000 wounded. These numbers were overshadowed by reports of such atrocities by American soldiers as the slaughter of women and children in My Lai. The military itself showed signs of weakness, including drug abuse and mutiny. Despite Nixon’s attempt to widen the conflict by invading Cambodia, long seen as a staging ground for invading South Vietnam from the west, Nixon was eager to get to the peace table, and out of Vietnam. The end result of those negotiations left North Vietnam in occupation of 30% of the south, with 145,000 troops. The United States agreed to withdraw all troops. What Nixon called an honorable peace was merely an American retreat. In retrospect, there were two primary reasons that the United States lost the Vietnam War. The first was that the United States never had a vision of why it was fighting the war in the first place, and therefore never had a clear sense of what would constitute a victory. All of the war policies were driven by government reaction to the opinions of those in opposition. The second was that the Vietnamese knew that the Americans did not have the stomach to fight a guerrilla war, even with vastly superior numbers. Because of this, the Vietnamese could retreat into the jungles and rice paddies, and wait for the Americans to tire of the mysterious, unseen enemy, and slink out of the country. Works Cited Bailey, Thomas, and Kennedy, David. The American Pageant: A History of the Republic. Lexington, Massachusetts: D.C. Heath and Company, 1987. Johnson, C.A. and Carroll, J. The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2004. Kaiser, D. American tragedy: Kennedy, Johnson, and the origins of the Vietnam War. Boston: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2000. Small, M. Covering Dissent: The Media and the Anti-Vietnam War Movement. Trenton: Rutgers University Press, 1994. ________. Johnson, Nixon and the Doves. Trenton: Rutgers University Press, 1988. The Wars for Vietnam: 1945 to 1975. Accessed 11 October 2006 online at http://vietnam.vassar.edu/overview.html. VanDeMark, B. Into the Quagmire: Lyndon Johnson and the Escalation of the Vietnam War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Crisis of Confidence: The American Military Failure in Vietnam Essay, n.d.)
Crisis of Confidence: The American Military Failure in Vietnam Essay. https://studentshare.org/politics/1705016-history-why-did-the-usa-fail-to-defeat-north-vietnam
(Crisis of Confidence: The American Military Failure in Vietnam Essay)
Crisis of Confidence: The American Military Failure in Vietnam Essay. https://studentshare.org/politics/1705016-history-why-did-the-usa-fail-to-defeat-north-vietnam.
“Crisis of Confidence: The American Military Failure in Vietnam Essay”. https://studentshare.org/politics/1705016-history-why-did-the-usa-fail-to-defeat-north-vietnam.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Crisis of Confidence: The American Military Failure in Vietnam

Multilateralism and the International Organizations

Still, after the Second World War, the leaders saw the League of Nations failure and decided to create the United Nations in 1945 with a structure intended to address the weaknesses of the previous body.... This paper "Multilateralism and the International Organizations" focuses on the issue of multilateralism which according to en-Wikipedia is a term in international relations that refers to multiple countries working in concert on a given issue....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Effects of the Cold War on the Global Relations of the Third World Nations

Obviously, it has divided them into two schools.... In answer to this question, one group of scholars argue that the Soviets' expansionist communist idealism panicked the US-led Western… llies of the Second World War and forced them to take more rigid steps to impede this expansionist enthusiasm of the Soviet Leaders....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

American desire to modernise third world countries fuelled the Vietnam war

The US sought a coherent plan to jumpstart the economic and social development in vietnam.... The US sought a coherent plan to jumpstart the economic and social development in vietnam.... The article further argues that modernization theory gained policy and academic prominence in vietnam.... The US used the theory of modernization and pacification in its quest to modernize third world countries such as the vietnam.... … Mark Berger, in his article: “Decolonisation, modernization and nation building” explains that the US fused pacification and modernization theory in its search for the appropriate combination of civil and security reforms in the hamlets of vietnam....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

How the Cold War Shaped the US Socio-Political and Economic Landscape

his Act greatly changed the face of the american population.... The only war that was exception to these objectives was the Korean and vietnam wars.... This supremacy battle led to the Cold War, which was a state of military and political tension after World War II between the Western bloc and the Eastern bloc.... As the cold war came to dominance, most of american policies toward the rest of the world, attitudes about immigration and immigration policies began to change....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Defeat in Vietnam Showed the Limits to American Power

This paper "The Defeat in vietnam Showed the Limits to American Power" presents the war in vietnam that demonstrated that there are limitations to a military superpower's capabilities.... hellip; The current conflict in Iraq proves that if this important lesson learned from the involvement in vietnam is not understood, the U.... drew a metaphorical line in the sand in vietnam....   A product of justifications stemming from the Cold War, anti-communism sentiments, Vietnam became the benchmark by which american military limitations can be measured....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The US Military Capacity to Enforce Its Will in Foreign Regions

involvement in vietnam is that America entered into this horrific and bloody and enduring conflict believing it to be the 'knight in shining armor' for the South Vietnamese people.... nbsp; indisputably, America entered Vietnam with somewhat of an arrogance assuming the North Vietnamese would bow to the powerful american military and that the South Vietnamese would gladly accept and adjust to a western nation style of democratic governance.... foreign policy, from its abandonment of isolationism at the ending of the 19th century to its status as the sole remaining superpower, has always been centered on the promotion and conservation of its own interests and 'the advancement of civilization,' the exercise of power to assert itself beyond the bounds of the american continents in 'the interest of civilization and of humanity' and its own selfish interests....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

The Fog of War Movie and the Article Supremacy by Stealth by Robert Kaplan

It is true that the United States decision to join the vietnam War was not clarified because Americans knew they were fighting a cold war while the Vietnamese knew they were fighting a tribal war (errolmorris.... Such misunderstanding contributed to wrong decision-making in the vietnam War.... The Fog of War presents the principles summarised from the experience of the former secretary of defense, and supremacy by stealth combines information from military personnel, to provide us with the principles vital in directing us towards the achievement of good governance....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Confidence Crisis at the 1970s

During the 1970s, suffered a crisis of confidence, and amongst the reasons for the emergence of this crisis were the cold war, the Vietnam War, and the Watergate scandal (Hamilton, 357).... uring the 1970s, suffered a crisis of confidence, and amongst the reasons for the emergence of this crisis were the cold war, the Vietnam War, and the Watergate scandal (Hamilton, 357).... The cold war is another factor that led to the emergence of the crisis of confidence in the United States....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us