StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Active and Passive Euthanasia by James Rachels - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
Active euthanasia is preferable to passive euthanasia in some instances like when a patient is suffering and is pain since from a moral stand point, by actively euthanizing a patient (through injections), you are easing their suffering and pain. In addition, the intention for…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.1% of users find it useful
Active and Passive Euthanasia by James Rachels
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Active and Passive Euthanasia by James Rachels"

Active and Passive Euthanasia al Affiliation) Question One Active euthanasia is preferable to passive euthanasia in some instances like when a patient is suffering and is pain since from a moral stand point, by actively euthanizing a patient (through injections), you are easing their suffering and pain. In addition, the intention for actively euthanizing the person is not death itself but to ease the person’s suffering and pain. Death is merely unavoidable.Question TwoAccording to Rachels, the conventional moral doctrine, which permits passive euthanasia but disallows active euthanasia, can facilitate people to base life and death decisions on moral grounds that are irrelevant.

This is because the doctrine exclusively asserts that it is morally better to let someone die rather than kill him/her without stipulating the conditions. In some instances, both actions may have a similar outcome that is morally repugnant (self-interest and greed). In other instances like in a cancer patient, active euthanasia may ease the pain of the patient rather than letting them suffer in the name of morality (Rachels, 2010).Question ThreeThe Smith case shows how he actively killed his six year old cousin while the Jones case shows how even if he did not actively kill his six year old cousin, he let him die even though he had the power to save him but chose not to.

According to Rachels, there are no moral differences between the two cases even though one is passive and the other active. In this case, the act of killing (active) is not worse than letting someone die (passive). The two cases are in fact morally equivalent as none is worse or better than the other.Question FourIt’s a mistake to assert that passive euthanasia isn’t intentional killing because in some instances, it is logically permissible for the act actively killing someone to be equivalent to the act of letting someone die, as evidenced in the Smith and Jones case.

In some instances, the reason behind active and passive killing may be the intent to kill, thus making both acts morally equal.Question FiveIt’s inaccurate to state that a doctor adopting passive euthanasia is in a moral sense doing nothing because in some instances, the inaction of the doctor may result to a terminal patient enduring more pain and suffering for a longer period of time. In fact, if the doctor euthanizes the patient actively, he may ease the patient’s pain, whose intention is morally acceptable.

Reference ListRachels, James. (2010). Active and Passive Euthanasia. New England Journal of Medicine, 78-80.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Active and Passive Euthanasia by James Rachels Assignment - 1”, n.d.)
Active and Passive Euthanasia by James Rachels Assignment - 1. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/psychology/1698854-active-and-passive-euthanasia-by-james-rachels
(Active and Passive Euthanasia by James Rachels Assignment - 1)
Active and Passive Euthanasia by James Rachels Assignment - 1. https://studentshare.org/psychology/1698854-active-and-passive-euthanasia-by-james-rachels.
“Active and Passive Euthanasia by James Rachels Assignment - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/psychology/1698854-active-and-passive-euthanasia-by-james-rachels.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Active and Passive Euthanasia by James Rachels

Morality of Active Euthinasia

"active and passive euthanasia.... This mercy killing is, in some sense, even more compassionate than passive euthanasia, whereas the physicians forgo the life sustaining treatment and let the patient suffer to death.... It will also reassure them that they can choose quick death over the prolonged passive euthanasia.... (rachels 78)In my opinion, the morality of active euthanasia actually depends on the situation.... achels, james....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The morality of euthanasia

The active and passive dichotomy is a distinction without a difference.... These are some very important questions which need to be… james rachels has argues that under certain circumstances active euthanasia should be morally permissible and this is a very sound argument.... james rachels has argues that under certain circumstances active euthanasia should be morally permissible and this is a very sound argument.... rachels emphasizes on killing Vs letting die argument and this Client's 23 October Euthanasia has become a very debatable topic in the recent past, euthanasia refers to painless death....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

A response to the prompt

The moral debate… Some clearly oppose any kind of euthanasia (both active and passive) and argue that life is too valuable to be taken, and that there is no difference Others argue that it might be morally permissible to take lives in certain special cases.... The second option is a perfect example of passive euthanasia.... This makes the second option also complicated as many also argue against passive euthanasia.... Some might argue that letting a patient die and taking a life might be morally indifferent (rachels, 87)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

A Moral Difference between Killing and Letting Die

The term passive euthanasia describes this approach of allocating resources to those who have a better chance of living.... hellip; This essay explores the “active” and “passive” euthanasia.... Those who are against active euthanasia argue that killing is morally worse than letting someone die intentionally.... Therefore, there is no moral difference between killing and letting die, but in some cases, active euthanasia is preferred....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Euthanasia and Abortion

Thus, the supporterd point out that the ideas of passive and active euthanasia are very different and “the process of being ‘allowed to die' can be relatively slow and painful, whereas being given a lethal injection is relatively quick and painless” (rachels 2).... However, there are two situations, namely euthanasia and abortion, which present obstacles on the way of exercising one's right to bodily autonomy.... First of all, it may be logical to analyze the idea that favors this approach with regard to euthanasia....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Active and Passive Euthanasia: Two Sides of the Same Coin

"active and passive euthanasia: Two Sides of the Same Coin" paper focuses ion are two types of Euthanasia.... The first is 'Active Euthanasia' and the second is 'passive euthanasia'.... nbsp; 'euthanasia'  is the answer to a  wish of death by a  patient suffering from painful experiences every day.... 'euthanasia' is a word derived from Greek origin which means an easy death (Keown 2002.... However, even though 'active' and 'passive' euthanasia seems to be different, they are ultimately one and the same....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Whether Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Ethical for Terminally Ill Patients

As noted above, there are many arguments about euthanasia because it is an ethical issue and many people disagree on ethical issues.... euthanasia is often also defined as mercy killing, n which a doctor or another person permits someone to die because they are seen to be hopelessly sick or injured.... Many people think that euthanasia is favorable because it spares people of pain and suffering and lets people make their own choices about whether to die or not....
10 Pages (2500 words) Coursework

In What Circumstances Is Voluntary Euthanasia Morally Permissible

paper establishes the five conditions necessary in order to perform voluntary Euthanasia then they are refuted using the arguments by james rachels and Daniel Callahan.... james rachels considers euthanasia morally incorrect.... (rachels 1999) Callahan considers that the patient, who was considering Euthanasia, wasn't possible able to make his decision with self-determination; therefore euthanasia would be one person taking control of the life of another person, thus murder too....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us