StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

What factors will be relevant in resolving this dispute and how will they be applied by the court in this case - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The Act intends to define land ownership rights and settlement of land and property disputes. The given case of Agatha and Kev falls within the…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.3% of users find it useful
What factors will be relevant in resolving this dispute and how will they be applied by the court in this case
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "What factors will be relevant in resolving this dispute and how will they be applied by the court in this case"

Case Analysis Case Analysis The “TLATA” (Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act), an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom was introduced in 1996. The Act intends to define land ownership rights and settlement of land and property disputes. The given case of Agatha and Kev falls within the settlement sections of TLATA. A close analysis of the case on the grounds of TLATA points to the fact that the law would favour Agatha. Evidently, the rambling mansion belongs equally to both Agatha and Kev.

As per the trust of the land or TLATA, the ownership of it goes to both, and therefore, the co-partner can never take any decision without the consent of the partner. Of course, Kev does hold ownership of the mansion and can enjoy the profit from it if any. However, he is not entitled to sell it or insist Agatha to vacate the mansion. Also, section 12 of the Act states that “beneficiary is entitled to an interest in possession in land subject to a trust of land is entitled by reason of his interest to occupy the land”1.

Section 14of the Trust of Land and Appointment Trustees Act 1996 specifies court’s power in preventing the disposal of property. The law further denotes that selling the property should be “free of any equitable rights” which does not apply in this case. Similar to this case, a recent judgment on a case study of Jones v Kernott (2011) UKSC 53 reveals the fact that the person’s interest on the property should be recognized and fulfilled as he has 50:50 share or ownership on land or property2.

Hence, in this case Agatha has to make only certain amount of compensations if Kev does not experience any benefit from the property. No law of the country would ever prevent her from staying at the mansion for the rest of her life. A jury would always observe a person’s state of mind, intension, and whether it hurts any of the partners in some ways or other. In this case, Agatha’s desire to remain in rambling mansion has to be accepted, because she as the co-owner and an aged woman deserves caring consideration for every cause.

The question of who would be justified never occurs in this respect, for Agatha always has the right to stay at her property though she may not be the mighty one among the partners. On the flip side, when one considers the demand of Kev, his claim does not point to any loss he experiences because of Agatha’s stay. Since he does not have a clear reason to support the immediate sale of the mansion, his argument would not sustain in the court of law. TLATA always intends to ensure peace and harmony.

Agatha may have to make certain level of compensation if Kev proves that he does not get any benefits from the mansion. But such claims of Kev should have valid proofs and witnesses. Moreover, the court has its legal procedure to have trial during which it will analyze essential documents in order to give the best judgment. Altogether, it would substantiate Agatha as she possesses the complete documents and rights of ownership. ReferencesJones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 Collas.Crill. Trust of Land and Overreaching.

Best Practice Offshore Law. ‘Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996’. Section 12. (Legislation.gov.uk) < http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/47/section/12> accessed 15 Jan 2014.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“What factors will be relevant in resolving this dispute and how will Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1626262-what-factors-will-be-relevant-in-resolving-this-dispute-and-how-will-they-be-applied-by-the-court-in-this-case
(What Factors Will Be Relevant in Resolving This Dispute and How Will Essay)
https://studentshare.org/law/1626262-what-factors-will-be-relevant-in-resolving-this-dispute-and-how-will-they-be-applied-by-the-court-in-this-case.
“What Factors Will Be Relevant in Resolving This Dispute and How Will Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1626262-what-factors-will-be-relevant-in-resolving-this-dispute-and-how-will-they-be-applied-by-the-court-in-this-case.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF What factors will be relevant in resolving this dispute and how will they be applied by the court in this case

The Case of Tinsley v Milligan

in this case, the plaintiff contended that 'he who comes to equity must come with clean hands.... As such, in this case, two women paid for a property but placed the property in the name of one of them.... The paper "The case of Tinsley v Milligan" states that the criminal can make a restitutory claim for her right, as long as there is no reliance on illegality.... In Tinsley, the reliance principle had been given considerable importance, and it was applied to invoke property rights....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

The Procedural History of Yu Yu Kai Frank and Chan Chi Keung

The legal principle of res ipsa loquitur in this case is based on professional medical negligence and the extent to which the anesthetist had a duty of carse either contractually or in tort in using reasonable care and skill for administering anesthesia and for protecting the patient from injury aside from any injury that may be inflicted by or caused by the surgeon's own conduct or treatment.... The legal issue at the heart of this case was the extent.... hellip; The plaintiff appealed the trial judge's decision to the court of Appeal at which time the lower court's decision was reversed on the basis that the injury was in fact preventable....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Analyzing Wills Act of 1837

the court held that even if the legal title to the shares has not yet passed to the donee because the transfer was not yet registered with the company, the donor has already done everything under his control and power to effect the transfer of property to the donee.... In the similar case of Re Rose [1949] Ch 78, the donor intended to donate shares in a company.... This step is lacking in the case at hand....
14 Pages (3500 words) Case Study

Business Claims

Only after a court disposed of the matter is satisfied that offer and acceptance exist it will then look for consideration.... The paper "Business Claims" presents a detailed analysis of two business claims that have a place.... The first one against Eric Tylfot & Sons, where essential elements are offer, acceptance together with the doctrine of consideration....
12 Pages (3000 words) Case Study

The Presumption of Innocence in English Law

Legislative changes and case law3 have resulted in modifying the requirement of malice aforethought4 such that the prosecution now only has a duty to prove an intention to kill5 or to cause serious bodily harm6.... In order to determine what offences might have been committed it is necessary to examine each of the acts separately.... The intention is a subjective test reliant on what the jury considers the defendant would have foreseen as a consequence of his actions....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Why the Claimant Has Unfairly Dismissed

At the very least it can be accepted that the meeting was preceded by a confrontational tone which would have had some bearing on how the claimant perceived and interpreted what was to follow upstairs.... Accepting that the claimant's version of the confrontation is at the very least supported by the contents of the resignation and his subsequent denial that it was voluntary, it is submitted that the tribunal treats the claimant's statement as the best evidence of what transpired between the claimant and Perkins....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

The Concept of Consent in Relation to Rape- Why Is It So Complex

Till the decision of the court of Appeal in R v R, later confirmed by the House of Lords in appeal2consent for sex in a marriage was presumed to exist.... Though there are reported cases (this essay cites a case from 1877), the evolution of law relating to consent in rape cases has been very slow....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Andrea Yates Criminal Case: The Psychological Theory of Crime

"Andrea Yates Criminal case: The Psychological Theory of Crime" paper applies the psychological theory of crime to the criminal case of Andrea Yates, who drowned all her children in a bathtub.... concrete discussion of relevant theory makes the reviewing of criminal behavior more meaningful and understandable (Adler, Mueller & Laufer, 2003).... nbsp;… The prosecution did not adequately investigate or acknowledge Yates' postpartum risk factors, particularly with regard to the extent of neuroendocrine alterations and psychosocial adjustments....
12 Pages (3000 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us