StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

From Leibniz: Letters to Arnauld - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
I got to work on your order as soon as I woke up, but this was already after the deadline on the order had passed. I tried to write to you on the message…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.1% of users find it useful
From Leibniz: Letters to Arnauld
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "From Leibniz: Letters to Arnauld"

– The documents you uploaded with the order were not made available to me until sometime after I had gone to bed for the night. I got to work on your order as soon as I woke up, but this was already after the deadline on the order had passed. I tried to write to you on the message boards, but am not certain the message went through. The order is completed now and available below, but I would greatly appreciate it if you could place an extension on the original deadline (there should be a button available on your order page) so that I am not penalized for something that was well out of my control.

Student nameInstructor nameCourse nameDateLeibniz’s Letter to Arnauld The primary argument of Leibniz’s letters to Arnauld is to determine the true nature of material objects. Leibniz argues that they are not actually a single substance, but are instead combinations of things that act in unity in a given scenario or plane of existence. In exploring his ideas that all substantial things are already present from the original moment of creation, Leibniz addresses a question asked by Arnauld regarding how a single block of marble, as a substantial substance, can be considered such once it has been broken in two.

He states, “I think that a block of marble is, perhaps, only like a pile of stones, and thus cannot pass as a single substance, but as an assemblage of many” (215). As he makes his case for his way of reasoning, Leibniz’s argument is seen to be based upon the Scholastic concept of the substantial form as something existential from the material element. To try to make his point, Leibniz introduces a number of examples of substances that might be considered the same, but that are obviously not a single entity as proofs that his claim regarding the block of marble is correct.

He starts his analogies by comparing the substance of diamonds, pointing out how two diamonds are made from the same substance, but are not the same entity even when they are forced together such as when they are placed in the setting of a ring. The one that makes the most sense to me is the one in which he compares the concept of a lake full of fish to the idea of the substantial form. He says, “Therefore, I hold that a block of marble is not a complete single substance, any more than the water in a pond together with all the fish it contains would be, even if all the water and all the fish were frozen” (215).

Obviously, fish are not the same substance as water, even when they are frozen to the same degree as the water, and yet it can be understood how a block chiseled from this pond might be considered by some to be a single substance, i.e. a block of ice. While these are all physical examples of what Liebniz is trying to discuss, he attempts to point out that the important element is missing, the unifying structure in the example that forces change in one area to affect the rest equally. A diamond might be chipped off of a larger diamond, effecting change on both, but this change is not universal to either – only the face being chipped is affected.

He sets these base examples against the example of man and the greater community as something that has reached a higher plane of existence. Man is not as easily categorized in the simple terms of the diamond or the pond as he interacts within the body of a group. “These [groups such as armies or societies] are moral beings, beings in which there is something imaginary and dependent on the fabrication (fiction) of our mind” (216). In the example of the human equation, Liebniz insists that there is something greater, something indivisible and indestructrible because it cannot be located in the physical plane to be destroyed or divided.

This is because “its notion includes everything that will happen to it, something which can be found neither in shape nor in motion (both of which involve something imaginary …), but which can be found in a soul or substantial form, on the model of what is called me” (216). As a result of this assessment, Leibniz suggests that only those things that fall within this category can be considered substantial beings. This relates back to Plato’s theory of the forms, in which nothing actually visible on Earth to the human eye is in its pure state but is merely viewed as shallowly as if it were silhouettes parading past on an obscuring screen.

According to Leibniz, the defining difference is whether or not the substance has an element of the metaphysical, something that cannot be grasped simply by the material form of a substance. In bringing his thought this far, Leibniz is stalled by the consideration of what exactly comprises a substantial form. If a substantial form must carry with it some sense of the otherworldly, such that it cannot be dealt with from the material plane, then it is difficult to ascertain whether other elements such as rocks, trees or animals can also be considered substantial forms.

It would seem that in these cases, he might assign substantiality to the forms of the animals and plants but not to the rocks and soils. He says, “I assign substantial forms to all corporeal substances that are more than mechanically united” (216). As a result, it depends upon his understanding of the plants and animals before one can say definitively that he might give these substantial distinctions. This, in itself, suggests there is some weight to Leibniz’s argument as individual understanding plays such an important role in assigning designations to elements.

“If I am asked in particular what I say about the sun, the earthly globe, the moon, trees, and other similar bodies, and even about beasts, I cannot be absolutely certain whether they are animated, or even whether they are substances, or, indeed, whether they are simply machines or aggregates of several substances” (216). He determines that since everything can be divided into aggregate matter and conglomerations of various substances that sometimes work together to create something different, “we would never reach anything about which we could say, here is truly a being, unless we found animated machines whose soul or substantial form produced a substantial unity independent of the external union arising from contact” (216).

Since nothing else other than man was known at that time to have such a connection, Leibniz arrives at the conclusion that there is actually nothing else substantial in the visible world other than mankind itself.

Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“From Leibniz: Letters to Arnauld Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
From Leibniz: Letters to Arnauld Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1553164-from-leibniz-letters-to-arnauld
(From Leibniz: Letters to Arnauld Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
From Leibniz: Letters to Arnauld Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1553164-from-leibniz-letters-to-arnauld.
“From Leibniz: Letters to Arnauld Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1553164-from-leibniz-letters-to-arnauld.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF From Leibniz: Letters to Arnauld

Spinoza and Leibniz

Course Date Philosophy: Spinoza and leibniz Introduction: Historical Backgrounds Baruch Spinoza (1632---1677) was from Portuguese Jewish community of Amsterdam, Dutch Republic, but was excommunicated (law of 'cherem') in the age of 23, 1655.... (Nadler, 1999) Gottfried Wilhelm von leibniz (1646 ---1716) was born in Leipzig, Electorate of Saxony, Holy Roman Empire, and died in Hannover, Electorate of Hannover.... Briefly speaking, he invented lots of things: 'infinitesimal calculus;' 'monadic' concept; thesis that our Earth was the 'best of all possible worlds;' then, there were also 'leibniz harmonic triangle;' 'leibniz formula for determinants;' 'leibniz integral rule;' principle of sufficient reason; 'diagrammatic reasoning;' notation for differentiation; kinetic energy; proof of Fremat's little theorem; 'law of continuity;' 'transcendental law of homogeneity;' 'calculus ratiocinator;' binary number system, etcetera (Jolley, 1995)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Leibniz's Conception of Substance

leibniz was born in Leipzig, Germany.... hellip; leibniz's philosophical system is as follows: His conceptions of the nature of propositions and of substances.... leibniz's view rule out human freedom.... leibniz was dissatisfied with the way Descartes and Spin.... To leibniz, this conception of substance was inadequate because it blurred the distinctions among God, humans, and nature each of which leibniz wanted to keep separate....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Comparing the Media Strategies Employed by Green Organizations

UESTION 2Communications, Not TechnologyColin Delany in an online article titled Learning from Obama's Campaign Structure: How to Organize for Success writes that "Structure isn't sexy -- [and] to talk about the critical online tools of 2008 without discussing the framework that governed their use would be missing the most important part of the story.... One important lesson from Obama: the tools don't matter as much as how you use them.... om writes that "in fundraising, Obama followed in the footsteps of Howard Dean's 2004 bid by regularly soliciting small donations online from a wide swath of voters, raising record amounts online by federal filing deadlines....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Theory of Good by Wilhelm Leibniz

The essay "Theory of Good by Wilhelm leibniz" focuses on the real meaning of happiness and it is based on the principles of leibniz's life and including all his doing in an individuals perspective without analyzing the exact reality.... hellip; Gottfried Wilhelm leibniz was a famous German rationalist philosopher who not only made contributions in the field of philosophy but also in the field of ethics, physics, mathematics, theology ad logic....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Philosophical Writings of Wilhelm Leibniz

Many of his profound concepts have been culled from letters and other documents.... The thrust of this writing is to try to capture the diverse life of Gottfried Wilhelm leibniz, German metaphysicist and philosopher.... Historical sources don't clearly assert that leibniz was eclectic.... Among them, leibniz was a forerunner of wave particle theory.... "Philosophy - On Love of Wisdom from Truth & Reality") he discovered and developed Differential Calculus independently of Sir Isaac Newton whose work in calculus slightly preceded leibniz....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Philosophical Views of Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

The author of the essay "Philosophical Views of Gottfried Wilhelm leibniz" intends to critically assess leibniz's conceptions of nature and of substances and the interlinks of these concepts in his philosophical model of the universe.... hellip; leibniz was born in Leipzig, Germany.... leibniz's view rule out human freedom.... Whatever we do stems from our own will, and is done in pursuit of our vision of the good....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Leibniz's Mental Mill

The paper "leibniz's Mental Mill" states that it is crucial to continue studying various theories advanced by both the old and modern philosophers to make the understanding of humanity clear.... Famous philosophers such as leibniz, Moore and Hume among other notable researchers to formulate theories of analyzing the functioning of the human brain.... For example, leibniz came with the Mental Mill analogy that says that all actions are controlled by the mind....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Malebranche and Leibniz Solution to Evil

The paper "Malebranche and leibniz Solution to Evil" examines two theories, provided by philosophists Gottfried Wilhelm leibniz and Nicolas Malebranche, which explain and discuss the concepts of the problem of evil in the world and possible solution to these problems.... Thus, while there is a total agreement between Malebranche and leibniz regarding the role of God in creating the world, where both agrees that God did justice in creating the world, there has been a disparity in their view regarding the role of God in the occurrence of actions and events that causes human beings to suffer....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us