StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Appointing vs. Electing Judges to the Supreme Court - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The United State Congress then approves or disapproves of the appointment. The United States has had this practice since the inception of the new democracy. If approved, then the…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.7% of users find it useful
Appointing vs. Electing Judges to the Supreme Court
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Appointing vs. Electing Judges to the Supreme Court"

Supreme Court Justices Supreme Court Justices are appointed by the United s of America’s current President. The United Congress then approves or disapproves of the appointment. The United States has had this practice since the inception of the new democracy. If approved, then the Supreme Court Justice takes the bench for life. Some individuals believe this practice is wrong, believing that too much power is placed in individuals not elected. On the state level, some judges are elected due to the separate Federal and State level.

It mainly depends on the state in questions. Supreme Court Justices should be appointed and not elected despite arguments against the practice. Supreme Court Justices are appointed by the President and approved by the Senate. This view is not approved by all of the American public. Some see it as just a game between the President and Senate. The president “shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint" various high-level executive and judicial officers” which includes Supreme Court Justices (Amar and Amar).

It could be speculated that the President and Senate make and approves appointments for personal reasons such as individual politics. For example, conservatives appoint conservatives, like Bush’s appointment of Clarence Thomas. Another argument is too much power comes to the nine Supreme Court Justices, since these judges are not elected. Bork suggests “The nations of the West are increasingly governed not by law or elected representatives, but by unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable committees of lawyers applying no law other than their own will” (13).

Many major decisions have been made by nine Justices. An example would be when the Supreme Court ordered schools to be desegregated. This decision still affects children today. For years students were bussed from one end of the town to another just to integrate schools on the Supreme Court Justices’ ruling. The appointments of Supreme Court Justices are a vote of the people, even though they are not direct elections. The President and Senate are both elected by the people. This allows the people a voice, but in a narrower way.

The safeguard is once the Justice has their appointment, the President or Senate no longer has any power over them. Founding Fathers of the United States put this checks and balance system into place. “Presidents and Senators are free to base their decisions on the likely voting patterns of nominees, but may not extract pledges or promises” (Amar and Amar). This allows the appointed Justice to rule freely without fearing retribution from politicians. Some states have ruled in the state constitutions to elect judges.

Personally this action is too ripe for corruption. This takes time for the judge to campaign. If it is a sitting judge, the judge might give rulings in exchange for donations to their campaign. Appointed judges are better researched and perform better. Even though different states allow judges to be elected, this practice would not work on a Federal level. If allowed to vote for judges on a Federal level, only Republicans and Democrats would receive the positions. As it stands appointees do not have political affiliations.

The Supreme Court Justices are lawyers and judges, not elected officials. Appointments to the Supreme Court should continue to be made by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The people’s vote is being counted since both the President and Senate are elected by the United States Citizens. The Constitution allows this check and balance system as a foundation for democracy. Supreme Court Justices are judges, not politicians. The system should remain that way. Works CitedAmar, Vikram David and Akhil Reed Amar.

“What Are the Rules and Standards In the Judicial Appointments Game? With a Supreme Court Nomination on the Horizon, the Stakes are High.” FindLaw. Accessed 24 Mar. 2009 fromhttp://writ.lp.findlaw.com/amar/20050708.html Robert Bork. Coercing Virtue, The Worldwide Rule of Judges. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute Press, 2003. My paper is on whether we should let Presidents pick judges with Congress approval, or let the people elect judges. The paper should present both sides of the arguments clearly and precisely and have the analyzation of both sides effectively.

Also, it should have which choice you think is best. This is a college level essay and therefore should have NO grammatical errors. Please use two sources that present different sides of the argument that are both strong and clear. Consider the ramifications of both options and what would be the best for the country. Consider the idea that some states elect all there judges while others do not. The essay must be well-written and a high college-level essay.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Appointing vs. Electing Judges to the Supreme Court Essay”, n.d.)
Appointing vs. Electing Judges to the Supreme Court Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1553172-appointing-vs-electing-judges-to-the-supreme-court
(Appointing Vs. Electing Judges to the Supreme Court Essay)
Appointing Vs. Electing Judges to the Supreme Court Essay. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1553172-appointing-vs-electing-judges-to-the-supreme-court.
“Appointing Vs. Electing Judges to the Supreme Court Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1553172-appointing-vs-electing-judges-to-the-supreme-court.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Appointing vs. Electing Judges to the Supreme Court

The Judiciary in England and Wales

For instance, Baroness Brenda Hale is the only female justice out of the 12 places in the supreme court of England.... Such is the argument of the President of the supreme court, Lord Phillips, who favours judicial appointments based on merit over diversification.... In similar breath, Rabinder Singh became the first Sikh, a non-white, to be appointed a High court judge of England and Wales.... Consequently, the lone-rangers in the judiciary such as Hale have called for more women and ethnic minority judges in the courts....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Analysis of the Nevada Constitution

Article 5, sections 1 and 2 of Nevada constitution law provides that the governor be elected by qualified electors, while voting for members of the legislature and once in office, takes the supreme executive power of Nevada state vested on him or her as chief magistrate (“The constitution of ,” leg.... However, looking critically at Nevada's and USA constitution, there are similarities and differences in practical application of the policies and operations, especially those related to democracy and supreme powers in the judicial system, executive, and legislative arms....
11 Pages (2750 words) Term Paper

Constitution of Three Countries

If the parties involved are not satisfied, they then appeal to the Court of Appeal, and later to the supreme court.... Structures of the Court Systems of the United States, Britain, Kenya, and China United States Court System Structure Court of Last Resort or the supreme court: This is the most superior court in America and the final place where litigants can file appeals for their cases (“Introduction to the Court System,” 2003).... Appeal Courts: These courts come in between the supreme court and the trial courts and are found in the federal governments....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

The Texas Judicial System

The justice of the supreme court were elected by the governor with the consent of the Senate, however, in 1850 the offices were made elective (Braden 47).... In 1876 additional appellate court of the last resort was established while the supreme court did not review the decisions of the Court of Appeals.... The Texas supreme court has nine members and is the last resort in civil cases.... Shortly after the revolution, the Spanish law has been replaced by the Constitution of the Republic of Texas under which the judicial power was focused in supreme court....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Government System of the State of Nebraska

the supreme executive power of the state is vested in the governor, with their duty being to ensure the constitution is protected, and the state is run efficiently.... In the paper “The Government System of the State of Nebraska” the author discusses the political and territorial history of the state of Nebraska, which can be traced to its territorial period, where Nebraska's original boundaries were set by the Kansas-Nebraska act of 1854....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

Courts are Independent Agents of Social Change

In the case of America, the ultimate decision when it comes to legal judgements or decisions lies with the supreme court.... Rahl argues that the court is an institution that should be used to protect the interest of the minorities (1993).... In most cases, people come up with justice systems so that the vulnerable amongst the majority can be protected....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The State Judicial Selection Process

The state of Florida has one of the most intensive and comprehensive selection process and criterion used by people who would wish to be inducted to serve as judges.... There are two elaborate and defined or well-articulated processes of selecting the judges.... This is based on the… to begin with, the judges in the appellate courts are taken through a process called the assisted appointed which is squarely based on the Missouri plan.... The judges who serve in the lower courts such as the trial judges are Once a judicial officer ir a judge has been appointed, it would be expected that he or she would serve for a period of one year and then they would be subjected to a retention election based on the positive and negative affirmative yes or no....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Judicial Appointments

Master of the Rolls, President of the Queen's Bench Division, President of the Family Division and Chancellor of the High court are entitled as the “Right Honorable”.... Lord Justices are the judges of the court of Appeal.... High court judges are referred to as the Right Honorable.... District judges sit in the County court and Magistrates Courts.... Lord Irvine, the Lord Chancellor in 1997 announced that High court appointments would be open to all members of the legal profession....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us